The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
무선 네트워크의 업링크 데이터 통신에서 휴대용 컴퓨터는 기지국이 올바른 패킷을 수신하기 전에 패킷을 여러 번 재전송할 수 있습니다. 각 재전송은 휴대용 컴퓨터의 통신 대역폭과 배터리 에너지를 소비합니다. 따라서 재전송 횟수를 줄이는 것이 바람직합니다. 본 논문에서 우리는 공격적인 패킷 결합 이 목적을 위한 계획. 기지국은 다음과 같이 다수의 잘못된 복사본을 결합하기 위해 이 방식을 실행합니다: (1) 잘못된 복사본에 대해 비트별 다수 투표를 수행하여 결합된 패킷을 생성하고, (2) 이 결합된 패킷에서 가장 신뢰도가 낮은 비트를 식별하고, ( 3) 이 비트에 대한 올바른 비트 패턴을 검색합니다. 그러면 기지국은 올바른 패킷을 복구하여 평균 재전송 횟수를 줄일 수 있습니다. 제안된 방식은 여러 가지 장점을 가지고 있습니다. (1) 다수의 패킷 결합 방식보다 더 강력합니다. (2) 기존의 많은 ARQ 프로토콜을 보완하여 성능을 향상할 수 있습니다. (3) 패킷에 추가 비트를 추가하지 않습니다. 이는 무선 채널에서 추가 대역폭을 소비하지 않으며 (4) 기지국에 의해서만 실행되므로 휴대용 트랜시버는 단순하게 유지될 수 있습니다. 시뮬레이션 결과는 제안한 방식이 다수 패킷 결합 방식에 비해 대역폭 효율성과 에너지 효율성이 더 높다는 것을 보여준다.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
부
Yiu-Wing LEUNG, "Aggressive Packet Combining for Error Control in Wireless Networks" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E83-B, no. 2, pp. 380-385, February 2000, doi: .
Abstract: In uplink data communication in wireless networks, a portable computer may retransmit a packet multiple times before the base station receives the correct one. Each retransmission consumes communication bandwidth and battery energy of the portable computer. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the number of retransmissions. In this paper, we propose the aggressive packet combining scheme for this purpose. The base station executes this scheme to combine multiple erroneous copies as follows: (1) perform bit-by-bit majority voting on the erroneous copies to produce a combined packet, (2) identify the least reliable bits in this combined packet, and (3) search the correct bit pattern for these bits. Then the base station may recover the correct packet, thereby reducing the mean number of retransmissions. The proposed scheme has several advantages: (1) it is more powerful than the majority packet combining scheme, (2) it can complement many existing ARQ protocols to improve their performance, (3) it does not add additional bits to the packet and hence it does not consume extra bandwidth in the wireless channel, and (4) it is only executed by the base station and hence the portable transceiver can be kept simple. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme is more bandwidth-efficient and energy-efficient than the majority packet combining scheme.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/e83-b_2_380/_p
부
@ARTICLE{e83-b_2_380,
author={Yiu-Wing LEUNG, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Aggressive Packet Combining for Error Control in Wireless Networks},
year={2000},
volume={E83-B},
number={2},
pages={380-385},
abstract={In uplink data communication in wireless networks, a portable computer may retransmit a packet multiple times before the base station receives the correct one. Each retransmission consumes communication bandwidth and battery energy of the portable computer. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the number of retransmissions. In this paper, we propose the aggressive packet combining scheme for this purpose. The base station executes this scheme to combine multiple erroneous copies as follows: (1) perform bit-by-bit majority voting on the erroneous copies to produce a combined packet, (2) identify the least reliable bits in this combined packet, and (3) search the correct bit pattern for these bits. Then the base station may recover the correct packet, thereby reducing the mean number of retransmissions. The proposed scheme has several advantages: (1) it is more powerful than the majority packet combining scheme, (2) it can complement many existing ARQ protocols to improve their performance, (3) it does not add additional bits to the packet and hence it does not consume extra bandwidth in the wireless channel, and (4) it is only executed by the base station and hence the portable transceiver can be kept simple. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme is more bandwidth-efficient and energy-efficient than the majority packet combining scheme.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={February},}
부
TY - JOUR
TI - Aggressive Packet Combining for Error Control in Wireless Networks
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 380
EP - 385
AU - Yiu-Wing LEUNG
PY - 2000
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN -
VL - E83-B
IS - 2
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - February 2000
AB - In uplink data communication in wireless networks, a portable computer may retransmit a packet multiple times before the base station receives the correct one. Each retransmission consumes communication bandwidth and battery energy of the portable computer. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the number of retransmissions. In this paper, we propose the aggressive packet combining scheme for this purpose. The base station executes this scheme to combine multiple erroneous copies as follows: (1) perform bit-by-bit majority voting on the erroneous copies to produce a combined packet, (2) identify the least reliable bits in this combined packet, and (3) search the correct bit pattern for these bits. Then the base station may recover the correct packet, thereby reducing the mean number of retransmissions. The proposed scheme has several advantages: (1) it is more powerful than the majority packet combining scheme, (2) it can complement many existing ARQ protocols to improve their performance, (3) it does not add additional bits to the packet and hence it does not consume extra bandwidth in the wireless channel, and (4) it is only executed by the base station and hence the portable transceiver can be kept simple. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme is more bandwidth-efficient and energy-efficient than the majority packet combining scheme.
ER -