The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
이 문서에서는 AMN(의료 전원 네트워크)의 임피던스를 CISPR(국제 무선 간섭 특별위원회) 16-1-2 표준과 비교하는 간단한 방법을 제시합니다. 임피던스 측정 장비인 벡터 네트워크 분석기의 회로는 이상적이지 않으며, 측정된 임피던스에는 측정 불확실성이 포함되어 있습니다. 그러나 제안된 방법에서는 완전한 불확도 분석이 필요하지 않습니다. 테스트 중인 AMN의 측정된 임피던스와 CISPR 16-1-2 표준의 규제된 임피던스에 의해 임피던스가 모델링된 원래 전송 표준의 측정된 임피던스 사이의 상대적인 관계를 비교함으로써 표준에 대한 적합성을 결정할 수 있습니다. AMN 임피던스의 크기와 위상을 독립적으로 분석할 수 있습니다. 이 방법을 시연하기 위해 이를 상업적으로 이용 가능한 AMN에 적용합니다. 비교 결과는 완전한 불확도 분석을 통한 결과와 동등한 것으로 나타나 제안된 비교 방법의 타당성을 확인하였다.
Ryoko KISHIKAWA
National Institute of Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
부
Ryoko KISHIKAWA, "Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E102-B, no. 2, pp. 345-350, February 2019, doi: 10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094.
Abstract: This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094/_p
부
@ARTICLE{e102-b_2_345,
author={Ryoko KISHIKAWA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard},
year={2019},
volume={E102-B},
number={2},
pages={345-350},
abstract={This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={February},}
부
TY - JOUR
TI - Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 345
EP - 350
AU - Ryoko KISHIKAWA
PY - 2019
DO - 10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E102-B
IS - 2
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - February 2019
AB - This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.
ER -