The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
AHR(Ad Hoc Routing)은 구현 복잡성이 낮기 때문에 클러스터 기반 다중 홉 네트워크에서 최적의 라우팅을 대체하기 위해 제안되었습니다. 그러나 이러한 복잡성 감소는 필요한 전송 전력을 증가시키는 대가로 발생합니다. 또한, AHR 구현을 위해 기존의 분산 릴레이 선택을 적용할 경우, 수신기 선택 오류로 인해 요구되는 전송 전력이 또 한 번 증가하게 된다. 본 논문에서는 AHR에 필요한 전송 전력과 최적 라우팅에 필요한 전송 전력 간의 차이를 줄이기 위해 협력 전송과 AHR을 통합한 AHCR(Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing)을 제시합니다. 또한, DAHR과 AHR의 요구 전송 전력 간의 차이를 줄이기 위해 협력 전송과 AHR을 결합한 DAHCR(Distributed Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing) 방식 1이 제안되었습니다. 그런 다음 DAHCR 방식 1의 문제를 해결하고 DAHCR 방식 2를 제안합니다. 시뮬레이션 결과는 AHCR 및 DAHCR 방식 1의 필요한 전송 전력이 각각 AHR 및 DAHR의 전송 전력보다 낮다는 것을 보여줍니다. 또한, DAHCR 방식 2는 DAHCR 방식 1의 요구 전송 전력을 더욱 감소시킨다. 반면, DAHCR 방식 1은 DAHR에 비해 복잡도를 43% 증가시킨다. 게다가 DAHCR 스킴 2는 DAHCR 스킴 1.97에 비해 복잡성을 1% 증가시킨다.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
부
I-Te LIN, Iwao SASASE, "Distributed Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing in Cluster-Based Multihop Networks" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E94-B, no. 2, pp. 444-454, February 2011, doi: 10.1587/transcom.E94.B.444.
Abstract: Ad Hoc Routing (AHR) was proposed to replace optimal routing in cluster-based multihop networks since it offers lower implementation complexity. However, this complexity reduction comes at the cost of an increase in the required transmission power. In addition, when the conventional distributed relay selection is applied to implement AHR, another increase in the required transmission power occurs due to the receiver selection error. In this paper, Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing (AHCR) that integrates the cooperative transmission with AHR is presented to reduce the difference between the required transmission power of AHR and that of optimal routing. Besides, Distributed Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing (DAHCR) scheme 1 that combines the cooperative transmission with AHR is proposed to reduce the difference between the required transmission power of DAHR and that of AHR. We then address the problem of DAHCR scheme 1 and propose DAHCR scheme 2. Simulation results show that the required transmission power of AHCR and DAHCR scheme 1 is less than that of AHR and DAHR, respectively. In addition, DAHCR scheme 2 further reduces the required transmission power of DAHCR scheme 1. On the other hand, DAHCR scheme 1 increases the complexity by 43% compared to DAHR. Besides, DAHCR scheme 2 increases the complexity by 1.97% compared to DAHCR scheme 1.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.E94.B.444/_p
부
@ARTICLE{e94-b_2_444,
author={I-Te LIN, Iwao SASASE, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Distributed Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing in Cluster-Based Multihop Networks},
year={2011},
volume={E94-B},
number={2},
pages={444-454},
abstract={Ad Hoc Routing (AHR) was proposed to replace optimal routing in cluster-based multihop networks since it offers lower implementation complexity. However, this complexity reduction comes at the cost of an increase in the required transmission power. In addition, when the conventional distributed relay selection is applied to implement AHR, another increase in the required transmission power occurs due to the receiver selection error. In this paper, Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing (AHCR) that integrates the cooperative transmission with AHR is presented to reduce the difference between the required transmission power of AHR and that of optimal routing. Besides, Distributed Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing (DAHCR) scheme 1 that combines the cooperative transmission with AHR is proposed to reduce the difference between the required transmission power of DAHR and that of AHR. We then address the problem of DAHCR scheme 1 and propose DAHCR scheme 2. Simulation results show that the required transmission power of AHCR and DAHCR scheme 1 is less than that of AHR and DAHR, respectively. In addition, DAHCR scheme 2 further reduces the required transmission power of DAHCR scheme 1. On the other hand, DAHCR scheme 1 increases the complexity by 43% compared to DAHR. Besides, DAHCR scheme 2 increases the complexity by 1.97% compared to DAHCR scheme 1.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.E94.B.444},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={February},}
부
TY - JOUR
TI - Distributed Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing in Cluster-Based Multihop Networks
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 444
EP - 454
AU - I-Te LIN
AU - Iwao SASASE
PY - 2011
DO - 10.1587/transcom.E94.B.444
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E94-B
IS - 2
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - February 2011
AB - Ad Hoc Routing (AHR) was proposed to replace optimal routing in cluster-based multihop networks since it offers lower implementation complexity. However, this complexity reduction comes at the cost of an increase in the required transmission power. In addition, when the conventional distributed relay selection is applied to implement AHR, another increase in the required transmission power occurs due to the receiver selection error. In this paper, Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing (AHCR) that integrates the cooperative transmission with AHR is presented to reduce the difference between the required transmission power of AHR and that of optimal routing. Besides, Distributed Ad Hoc Cooperative Routing (DAHCR) scheme 1 that combines the cooperative transmission with AHR is proposed to reduce the difference between the required transmission power of DAHR and that of AHR. We then address the problem of DAHCR scheme 1 and propose DAHCR scheme 2. Simulation results show that the required transmission power of AHCR and DAHCR scheme 1 is less than that of AHR and DAHR, respectively. In addition, DAHCR scheme 2 further reduces the required transmission power of DAHCR scheme 1. On the other hand, DAHCR scheme 1 increases the complexity by 43% compared to DAHR. Besides, DAHCR scheme 2 increases the complexity by 1.97% compared to DAHCR scheme 1.
ER -