The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
이 연구에서는 펜 압력과 펜 기울기 입력을 제어하는 인간의 능력을 조사하기 위해 이 제어를 커서 위치, 각도 및 크기와 결합하여 세 가지 실험을 수행했습니다. 세 가지 실험에서 펜 압력 입력과 펜 기울기 입력 간의 비교가 이루어졌습니다. 실험 결과에 따르면 압력 입력을 줄이면 성능이 매우 저하되고 세 가지 실험 중 어느 경우에도 좋은 입력 기술이 아닌 것으로 나타났습니다. "실험 1 - 커서 위치에 대한 결합"에서는 기울기 입력 기법이 증가하는 압력 입력 기법보다 시간 측면에서 상대적으로 더 나은 성능을 보였지만, 기울기 기법의 오류율이 약간 더 높았습니다. "실험 2-커서 각도에 대한 결합"에서는 시간 측면에서 증가하는 압력 입력보다 기울기 입력이 약간 더 나은 성능을 보였지만 실험 1만큼 그 차이가 눈에 띄지는 않습니다. "실험 3-커서 크기에 대한 결합"에서 ", 조정 시간 측면에서 압력 입력을 높이는 것보다 기울기 입력이 약간 더 나은 성능을 보였습니다. 실험 결과를 바탕으로 우리는 몇 가지 디자인 시사점과 지침을 추론했습니다.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
부
Xiaolei ZHOU, Xiangshi REN, "A Comparison of Pressure and Tilt Input Techniques for Cursor Control" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E92-D, no. 9, pp. 1683-1691, September 2009, doi: 10.1587/transinf.E92.D.1683.
Abstract: Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, by coupling this control with cursor position, angle and scale. Comparisons between pen pressure input and pen tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very poor performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In "Experiment 1-Coupling to Cursor Position", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique in terms of time, even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In "Experiment 2-Coupling to Cursor Angle", the tilt input performed a little better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time, but the gap between them is not so apparent as Experiment 1. In "Experiment 3-Coupling to Cursor Scale", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time. Based on the results of our experiments, we have inferred several design implications and guidelines.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/transinf.E92.D.1683/_p
부
@ARTICLE{e92-d_9_1683,
author={Xiaolei ZHOU, Xiangshi REN, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={A Comparison of Pressure and Tilt Input Techniques for Cursor Control},
year={2009},
volume={E92-D},
number={9},
pages={1683-1691},
abstract={Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, by coupling this control with cursor position, angle and scale. Comparisons between pen pressure input and pen tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very poor performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In "Experiment 1-Coupling to Cursor Position", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique in terms of time, even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In "Experiment 2-Coupling to Cursor Angle", the tilt input performed a little better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time, but the gap between them is not so apparent as Experiment 1. In "Experiment 3-Coupling to Cursor Scale", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time. Based on the results of our experiments, we have inferred several design implications and guidelines.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transinf.E92.D.1683},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={September},}
부
TY - JOUR
TI - A Comparison of Pressure and Tilt Input Techniques for Cursor Control
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1683
EP - 1691
AU - Xiaolei ZHOU
AU - Xiangshi REN
PY - 2009
DO - 10.1587/transinf.E92.D.1683
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E92-D
IS - 9
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - September 2009
AB - Three experiments were conducted in this study to investigate the human ability to control pen pressure and pen tilt input, by coupling this control with cursor position, angle and scale. Comparisons between pen pressure input and pen tilt input have been made in the three experiments. Experimental results show that decreasing pressure input resulted in very poor performance and was not a good input technique for any of the three experiments. In "Experiment 1-Coupling to Cursor Position", the tilt input technique performed relatively better than the increasing pressure input technique in terms of time, even though the tilt technique had a slightly higher error rate. In "Experiment 2-Coupling to Cursor Angle", the tilt input performed a little better than the increasing pressure input in terms of time, but the gap between them is not so apparent as Experiment 1. In "Experiment 3-Coupling to Cursor Scale", tilt input performed a little better than increasing pressure input in terms of adjustment time. Based on the results of our experiments, we have inferred several design implications and guidelines.
ER -